Thursday, October 9, 2014

To die, it's easy. But you have to struggle for life!

It seems that graphic novels are a thing now* and I like things and trends and whatnot and wanted to play. I'd only ever read one before, Fun Home, and thought it was time to give some more a try. I was limping** around The Strand and I found their graphic novel/comic book section and decided today is the day I try this graphic novel thing again. And thus I picked up Maus A Survivor's Tale and Kill Shakespeare.

I decided to start with Maus because I wanted to depress myself. Well, that's only one of the reasons. It's also one I've been meaning to read because I've heard nothing but great things about it. And it's closer in style to Fun Home which I enjoyed.

For those that don't know, (so like 4 of you? probably) Maus is about the Holocaust. Or I guess technically the first book, which is the one I read, is about the time leading up to the Holocaust.
Art Spiegelman tells his father's story of his time living in Poland leading up to being sent to a concentration camp. Jews are mice, nazis are cats, Polish non-Jews & non-Nazis are pigs and I think those are all the animals.

The idea of animals instead of people can make the story seem somewhat...happy? Not, not happy. It's still the Holocaust. Whimsical? For children? I mean, American Tale is about Jewish mice chased out of their home when their village is Russia is burned to the ground and the escape to the tenements of NYC. This is pretty much just that, right? No, but until just now I didn't think of the fact that there was another piece of media that used the mice as Jews thing.

I remember reading somewhere (and I really wish I could remember where) saying that a lot of Holocaust literature has some sort of frame story or element to add a layer between the reader and what happened (Death as narrator for The Book Thief for example).
The horror of the events are a lot to handle without some device that lets your guard down. If that was Spiegelman's intention it works well. The fact that the characters are mice in no way makes you care about them less. It also doesn't downplay the seriousness of the story or make things any less painful to read.

The story jumps back and forth between the present when Art is visiting his father and his step-mother (his mother committed suicide years earlier) to hear his father tell his story. His father never comes off as a saint. Or even a particularly present person to be around. Which if anything further humanizes his father, mouse or no mouse.

This was excellent. It was amazing and moving and terrifying and depressing and of course it made me cry. I wish I had picked up Maus II so I could pick it up immediately after. You should read it. Everyone should read it. If you don't think you like graphic novels, read it anyway.

Gif rating:


*OK, by "now" I mean I have recently heard non-graphic novel/comics people talking about them and starting to read them.
**I had, it turned out, sprained my ankle not long before getting to the bookstore because I was comparing how pale I am (very) against Tom (not pale at all) (this is not a surprise or anything. It's not like a new fact that he's much darker than me) and I messed up stepping off a curb because I am AMAZINGLY GRACEFUL. If you're wondering if it still hurts, yes, a little bit. So that's fun.

Title quote from page 122

Spiegelman, Art. Maus: A Survivor's Tale I: My Father Bleeds History. Pantheon Books, 1980

Comments (14)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Whenever I try and explain MAUS to anyone (it's a graphic novel! About the holocaust! And the Jews are mice!) they all pull this face like 'that doesn't sound very... Serious, but it really doesn't take anything away from the horribleness, not least because you know it's a true story that happened to real people and of spiegelman chooses to draw them as mice then that's fair enough.

Basically I have SO MUCH SO MUCH to say about Maus- I originally bought it because I had an out of date reading list for my first year of university, and while I'm really glad it introduced me to it, I'm really sad I didn't actually get to study it intensely because SERIOUSLY so much to say. Have you found/read the second part yet?
3 replies · active 545 weeks ago
Yeah trying to describe what the book is while still making sure it's clear that HOLY SHIT, this book is still serious and true and thank you for making everyone animals because that would have been hard to deal with otherwise. Harder. And I had so much trouble trying to find a gif for this cos I was like "Well it was great but someone excited and happy seems like the wrong tone for something like this."

I DID find Maus II. I just picked it up like 2 days ago, actually. I haven't started it yet cos yeah, I'm not reading this book in public. I will keep my emotions at home, thankyouverymuch.
I cry more at part two. Part two really, really hurts. So have fun (? Not fun. Something else) with that.
Yeah I'm sort of expecting to cry extra. Cos you know, death camp.
I think Maus is brilliant. And rather than using animals as allegorical, I wonder if Spiegelman was using animals to get readers who ARE distanced from the Holocaust to be more empathetic. Not that the average reader would be apathetic in this sense, but I think somehow using animals equalizes the playing field and completely eliminates any human differences we might see between the characters and ourselves.

In fact, I'd say that by using animals, he somehow manages to humanize the Jews' suffering all the more. If that makes sense. Because the subject is really so utterly horrific that I think most folks simply cannot process it beyond the level of ,"Oh, that's awful." But by putting the suffering into the animal realm, we can better process and therefore internalize and empathize with it.

But maybe that's just me.
2 replies · active 544 weeks ago
I think you're right that making the characters animals actually does humanize things. I never thought of the idea seeing animals instead of people could equalize the playing field but I think it makes a lot of sense!

I do think by adding this layer between us and the actual event we can actually get closer to it. It allows us to let our guards down and let the story get inside us in a way that otherwise would be blocked.
I like your brain, Emily.
Seeing the sheer amount of work and research that went into this graphic novel at the Spiegelman exhibit made me appreciate the book even more. I mean, I was instantly enamoured when I read the book (is that the right word to use about a book on the holocaust?) but when you look at thousands of pages of character design and different choices for the animal/nationality and listen to the interviews with his dad - it was intense.

Have a...time reading book 2. Seriously, what do you say about this kind of book? Good time? Enjoy reading it? Have a blast crying your eyeballs out?
1 reply · active 545 weeks ago
I am sort of afraid to start this and yet I am also really looking forward to it. But yeah, it's weird to say "excited" or even that I'm hoping to enjoy it. Finding a gif for this book was hard. I imagine trying to find one for book 2 is going to be even harder.
This was one of the first graphic novels I read and I just loved it. It's heartbreaking, but so beautifully written.
1 reply · active 544 weeks ago
So heartbreaking! I'm a little afraid to start the next book
I've had Maus I and II for maybe...almost 3 years now? And I STILL haven't read them. I started to read Maus I on a plane awhile back, and it was just not a good plane read. I sensed I was heading into Crying in Public Territory and aborted the mission. Thanks for reminding me why I really need to get these off the shelf pronto.
1 reply · active 544 weeks ago
YOU SHOULD READ IT! But good choice not reading it on the plane/in public in general. I wasn't suuuuper bad for the crying (I mean it still happened, but it wasn't constant) but I fear what's to come in II. Which is why I haven't started it yet.

Post a new comment

Comments by