Monday, May 12, 2014

What I am telling you, before you begin my story is this - two things: I crave truth. And I lie.

I finished Tana French's In The Woods a few weeks ago and I'm still mad at it. But let's not get ahead of ourselves.

In The Woods is a detective murder mystery novel. There are actually two murder mysteries going on. Twenty years before the events of the book two young children went missing in the Knocknaree woods. There was one child left, who was so terrified he couldn't remember anything that happened to himself, his two friends, or why his shoes are mysteriously filled with blood.

We're now in the present and this little boy has grown up to be Detective Rob Ryan, a member of Dublin's murder squad. He and his partner Cassie are given a case of a murdered girl, found near those same woods Rob had been found in years ago. From the back of the book, at least my copy: "Now, with only snippets of long-buried memories to guide him, Ryan has the chance to uncover both the mystery of the case before him, and that of his own shadowy past."

I very much enjoyed most of the book. I liked the set-up. I liked both mysteries. Rob makes for an interesting narrator. Not necessarily someone you can entirely trust. Not someone I liked all the time, but that's certainly not a requirement. The book seemed to end several times. I could see how many pages were left so I knew we couldn't be at the ending yet. Then again once we got near the end I couldn't believe that things were going to wrap up so quickly. I didn't have nearly enough pages left for everything we needed to get through.

One thing I very much liked in the book was the relationship between Rob and Cassie. At least most of the time. Whenever I read a book with a great male/female friendship, I spend a lot of time worrying the author is going to make it into a romance. Not that I don't like people to be in love, but I also really like friendship and maybe we don't have to treat friendship as lesser than a romantic relationship, mmmkay?

Now, here's the tricky part with this review. The parts of the book that make me mad and the parts that involve a lot of spoilers. I wish I could figure out a way to explain my frustration without throwing a bunch of spoilers at you, but I'm not that clever. So, if you don't want any spoilers, I'll just tell you that my enthusiasm for the book began to wane until I got to the end and I got angry at it and I likely won't read the other books in this series. Cos it is apparently a series. BUT I won't say I'll never read those books. I liked it enough to consider giving it another try. But it's going to have to shape up.

For those that want more details and don't care about spoilers. Remember, these are spoilers for a murder mystery so yeah, it will probably mess up your experience of the book if you know these going into it. Spoilery spoilery spoilers. You've been warned.
Hey, remember when I included that quote from the back of the book about how Rob had the chance to uncover both mysteries. You know what he doesn't do? Uncover both mysteries. (That would be in all caps-angry-internet-yelling but I'm trying to keep things calm here so those that don't want spoilers aren't accidentally pulled in. But please understand, I mean that all caps like.) The whole twenty-year-old mystery? Yeah, it stays a fucking mystery. And after all of those false endings earlier, we really rushed through the present day mystery. It was a supremely unsatisfying. And I'm still pissed.
Spoilers are above. For a murder mystery. So again, if you don't want things spoiled, don't read that.

If anyone else read this, let me know your thoughts. Were you as angry as me? Or did maybe I miss something?

Title quote from page 4

French, Tana. In The Woods. Penguin Books, 2007.

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I tried to avoid the spoiler, really I did, but I couldn't help it. It was just too tempting. But I can totally understand how that'd cause hatred. It's like when you're watching the film that just suddenly ends so that it can have a sequel. Sure, fine, have a sequel but you also need to have a complete film HERE otherwise no one will go to your stupid sequel.

I remember why I wanted to read this though, detectives who were once the victims of crimes, cliche as it may be, is always a win for me.
1 reply · active 565 weeks ago
I tried to figure out a way to hide the spoiler better. I was going to do the white text thing but one, my background isn't all white so didn't know how that would work and two, it shows up in black text in a blog reader regardless of what color I make it. I know, cos I've accidentally read spoilers that way. I need to make a button or something.

I'm not even sure if they answer this mystery in the other books. I was asking someone who's read them and she said the other books are from dif characters POVs and deal with completely different time frames. I actually don't think this is ever solved and WHAT THE HELL??

That said, the writing was very good. Rob's kind of a dick and I'm sad with how something else turned out but overall the book had me until we got to the end.
That was NOT a bad spoiler. I'd still read the book and feel totally unspoiled. Also, can we assume it's the longterm mystery that she's planning on uncovering in the other books in the series?
1 reply · active 565 weeks ago
It is a bad spoiler if you go into the book ASSUMING mysteries will be solved because you know, that's how these things go and also the back of the book says as much. Although maybe if you already know the spoiler then you won't be pissed at the end.

I asked a friend who's read the books if the mystery gets solved in the other books and she said nope. The other books are from the point of view of the other 2 main characters from this one. One of them is from Rob's partner Cassie's PoV, and takes place before the 2 of them meet. PERHAPS if she plans on writing more it will be answered. But I am skeptical.
I gave up on this book after Cassie and Rob's relationship soured. I just hated being in Rob's PoV after that. Then I skimmed to the end and found out who the murderer was for the present-day mystery and I am just absolutely so tired of that category of murderer in book/TV/movie narratives.
1 reply · active 562 weeks ago
I didn't give up on the book at this point. Or at least I read the rest of the pages but in spirit, this is totally the point I soured on the book. And prior to that I was taking notes and writing about how happy I was that this was a platonic friendship and nothing sexy and then NO DAMMIT WHY DID YOU DO THAT? I was in denial and kept thinking "It's ok, this is something their friendship could get past" but NOPE. Ugh. French, you jerk.

Post a new comment

Comments by