Monday, June 6, 2011

Overreacting parents and YA fiction

The interwebs, at least the book section of it, seems to be up-in-arms over a recent WSJ piece Darkness Too Visible by Meghan Cox Gurdon about how YA is too dark and disturbing for little cherub teenagers and they're minds are being corrupted if they read this stuff and they'll all become serial killers and whatnot. Won't somebody please think of the children. The usual complaints that pop up every few years. I'm not going to worry about that argument or even get into the #YASaves hashtag that popped up on Twitter. Plenty of other people have taken this up and written in defense of YA. I don't think I have too much to add to that argument. I don't really read YA now and when I was 13 I read a weird mix of Alexander Dumas and Stephen King, so I won't be able to share a story about how YA saved me.

Here's the part that I do want to share and why I'm having trouble getting worked up over this latest call for censorship: Gurdon seems to be going off a knee-jerk reaction to the main YA titles represented in bookstores. Here's a line from the opening of the piece:
[Amy Freeman] had popped into the bookstore to pick up a welcome-home gift for her 13-year-old, who had been away. Hundreds of lurid and dramatic covers stood on the racks before her, and there was, she felt, "nothing, not a thing, that I could imagine giving my daughter. It was all vampires and suicide and self-mutilation, this dark, dark stuff." She left the store empty-handed.
Granted, this is not Gurdon's own experience, but rather her telling of a different mother's failed journey to find a book for her teen. Freeman walks into a bookstore, looks around and see books she doesn't like for her daughter and leaves. Without buying anything. Again, she wants to buy a book for her daughter, sees some YA books she doesn't want for her daughter and she leaves without getting her any books. I'm pretty sure had Freeman looked slightly to the left, she probably would have seen some non-vampire, self-mutilation books that would have made a fine gift. I'm often able to go into a bookstore and avoid the shelves of books I don't want. Part of that freewill thing I try to make use of. So she didn't like the YA book options that make up the majority of that section. I don't either. Welcome to the club. Find something else for your daughter if you don't want her reading it. Plenty of other options available. Hell, I'm sure there are other options within the YA shelf. But she looked at the shelves, freaked out over a couple titles and left.

Again, I know this isn't Gurdon's experience, but she chose it to open her story and thus I'm applying the Freeman's reaction to what Gurdon sees as a reasonable reaction to the state of YA publishing. And that alone is keeping me from taking this seriously. In the end I'm against general censorship, but if you don't want your kid reading something, it's your kid. Go ahead and keep it from them. That's your choice as a parent. Hopefully you're taking the time to really understand what the books you're banning around about (sadly I doubt this happens very often) but if not, well, just don't get in the way of me reading what I want.

Comments (14)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Does A Wrinkle in Time count as YA? 'Cause if so, I vote for that woman's daughter reading that.
2 replies · active 721 weeks ago
I think it does. I've never actually read that one but heard good things about it. I think I may have missed the window for it though.
Hmmmmmmm. You would maybe still like it. They deal with space travel using like...physics and stuff. And 'It' is really interesting.
I don't understand if these uptight parent's were never teenagers or what, but I seem to remember it being a pretty tricky time, and one in which, had I read about vampires I wouldn't have become one (obviously) and where reading that other teenagers have a tough time too might have been pretty helpful. I don't understand these parents who think their children are basically mindless zombies who are going to use a fictional novel as a life guide- I mean, really? At least they're reading right?

Sorry, I haven't done a post on this, so I'm apparently saying my piece here! Love you for the simpsons link too by the way :)
1 reply · active 721 weeks ago
Agreed. Teens can tell the difference between fact and fiction, between what behavior is good and what is dangerous. Like you said, at least they're reading. I think if you've made it to the point that your kid wants to read, you're going in the right direction.

Glad you appreciate the Simpsons link :)
Great post Red. Yeah, I totally get that those type of books did not appeal to this mother. They don't appeal to me either, and I can see how I wouldn't want them for my child either if I was picking out her books. But there are several several several other types of books to choose from. Even in just the YA section. There are plenty of CLASSIC YA books to buy for goodness sake. Now, if the general complaint is just that nowadays the YA genre is just getting an overfill of too much sexy vampire weirdo crap, okay, there might be something there. But I really don't read much YA so...
1 reply · active 721 weeks ago
Thank ya. I understand not being able to find some quality YA stuff. The genre is getting saturated and a lot of it will be crap. But it's not all going to be awful and there's plenty else out there. Congratulations, you found a lot of bad books. Don't read those then. Problem solved!
To be honest, I don't get why people are getting so enraged. I just read the article - some woman somewhere thinks that YA fiction is dark. Okay. That's nice. It's not a call for censorship, except in the sense that parents should familiarize themselves with what their children are reading, which is excellent advice. She often presents other sides of the argument (even if she does disagree with them). It's an opinion. Getting so angry about somebody's nonintrusive opinion isn't much better than blindly banning books. This is my first reaction to the article so maybe after reflection I'll change my tune.
1 reply · active 721 weeks ago
I agree that it's just an opinion and she isn't calling for total banning of books, which is good. She does talk about how if the publishers aren't going to act as "gatekeepers" it will be up to parents so it seems she is wishing for more censorship, which I take issue with. But I agree that parents knowing more of what their kids are reading can only be a good thing. Now the story in the beginning, where the lady flees the bookstore when presented with some YA books leads me to believe that she's looking at the parents that are not necessarily going to the extra step to learn about these YA titles.

Granted I don't know what all of the backlash has been and judging by the Twitter tag it's getting a bit heated and moreso than the story perhaps warrants.
I wish she had come into the library and asked a librarian for some suggestions -- that's what readers' advisors do .... and we have plenty of great books here that I'm sure she (and her daughter) would love. geez....... :)
1 reply · active 721 weeks ago
That would have been nice that she didn't give up on books just because she didn't like a couple of the titles she saw.
I think you make a very good point Red-the anecdote was the lead for the article, and it set the tone (dire) in what was really a straw man argument. It did seem as though there was laziness all around (lazy shopping, lazy arguing). I would be curious to know whether the child's tv, computer use, and text messaging are subjected to the same scrutiny.
1 reply · active 721 weeks ago
I wouldn't be surprised if the woman's daughter dealt with the same level of ignorance and overreaction with her other media. I think a parent should be involved, know what their kids are reading/watching whathaveyou but they need to be informed and not just freak out without really understanding what's going on.

Post a new comment

Comments by