Thursday, February 3, 2011

I am getting better at smiling when people expect it

After the Twilights and other paranormal romance, I had written off YA literature. I know it's wrong to ignore an entire section of the bookstore based on a few bad apples but I did. I figured it didn't matter. If I hadn't received this copy of Speak for free, I never would have given it a second glance. And that would have been a shame because then I would have missed out.

Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson is a difficult and yet simple (not easy) novel. Anderson says "Speak is not just a book about rape. Speak is a book about depression" (204). Obviously a book dealing with rape and depression is not going to be a necessarily pleasant read.  Add to the fact that the main character, Melinda, is only 13 when raped and the topic gets that much harder. Anderson has a definite writing style that works well for the genre and the topic. It would have been easy for the book to focus on the violence but she doesn't. The book focuses on Melinda's school year and how she wrestles with her emotions and her guilt and her pain. Not only is Speak not just a book about rape, I'd say it's primarily about depression. It's just set off by that singular moment.

The book is told from Melinda's point of view. The sentences are short and to the point, without any flowery descriptions. It feels like this could have come straight from the mind of a teenager and indeed Anderson mentions researching teen speak by hanging out a Taco Bell and mall food courts (204).

Ben over at Dead End Follies says the book got under his skin and I have to agree. I started it without any real expectation that I would really like it. I didn't assume I'd hate it, I just assumed I wouldn't remember it. Then I was reading it and I couldn't put it down. And more than that I started getting angry at Melinda (more on that in a second). If I don't care about what I'm reading or what I'm watching, it stands to reason that I don't care what happens to the characters. But when I noticed myself feeling something other than apathy, I knew the book was getting to me.

*This part will have some spoilers in it. Although I already told you Melinda gets raped so really, that's the only surprise. And I ruined that for you already. Sorry about that.*
Yes, I was angry at Melinda. I was angry at her for a lot of the beginning of the book. Am I that much of an asshole that I'm actually angry at a young girl who is a rape victim? Apparently, but please hear me out before you hunt me down with pitchforks. I was mad at her because she was acting like a victim. Now, I don't actually think Melinda did anything wrong or anything unusual or anything different than I would have done if I had gone through what she did. But I was angry that it happened at all and I, as the reader, didn't have the details as to exactly what happened. So my anger got filtered over to her. Which is unfair. And wrong. And please understand I would never blame a rape victim for their attack. I don't blame Melinda for her attack and she's not even real. But as a fictional character and one I could argue with, I just wanted to shake her and yell at her to quit being a victim. And maybe stab the guy in the face. I get stabby when rape is involved.

So yeah, when I started yelling at the character (in my head. I'm not that crazy) I knew the book was getting to me.

One complaint I do have is that the ending came too quickly. I felt like we spent so long in the beginning watching Melinda be sad and then the ending was rushed. She finally starts to turn and confront what has happened and begins to open up, beings to speak, then BAM the book is over. I would have liked to see her strength grow more before all of a sudden we're done. Although I don't have any interest in a possible sequel Anderson is considering writing. I think the story has been told and while I like Melinda I think any follow up to her will cheapen the original story.
*Phew spoilers over. And hopefully those of you that read it do not want to attack me. Or even if you do still want to, please don't.*

Reading and enjoying Speak does not suddenly mean that I'm going to start reading a bunch of YA. It just means that if someone whose opinion I trust recommends a YA book I won't so quickly turn my nose up at it. And if you get the chance you should check it out. It's a very quick read so if you have a few hours you can finish it.

Title quote from page 32

Anderson, Laurie Halse. Speak. Penguin Group, New York. 1999

Comments (21)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Glad you liked it. I agree about the ending as I felt it stripped the tale from a good chunk of its power. Something that damaging sends a huge shockwave and hurts other people as well as the victim. It's good, but it could have been so much more.
1 reply · active 741 weeks ago
I did enjoy! Thanks for the book & the review that convinced me this was worth a read. I thought the beginning was so strong I wish the ending had matched it.
This book was all over the blogosphere and the news recently in that big to-do about censorship, and I've had my eye on it ever since. Like you, I don't usually read YA, but perhaps it's time for an exception to that not-hard-and-fast-rule.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
The idea of censoring this book is silly. I don't agree with any censorship but I at least can understand the reasoning behind some of it. This book isn't graphic and it isn't exploitative. This seems like the perfect book for people in middle school and high school to get people talking about a serious problem.
The movie was really good too.
3 replies · active 741 weeks ago
Did the movie have limited release? I don't remember this coming out at all and it doesn't look like it had a lot of reviews.
I honestly don't know--I don't remember it being in the theaters, but that doesn't mean a whole lot. I can't even remember where I first heard of it. But I do remember thinking it would probably suck, and I ended up being very impressed. Who knows how much of that had to do with low expectations. Also--I haven't read the book, so I can't compare the two.

I blogged about the movie here if you're interested.
Thanks for the link! I'll check this out. Judging from the Wikipedia page, the 2 are very similar except for some minor changes. Maybe I'll look for this to come on TV. I'm not sure I'm ready to go seek it out to watch but who knows.
The movie has Kristen Stewart as Melinda. I am extremely skeptical. On the photos, Kristen Stewart looks like she plays Kristen Stewart with a hat. I pictured Melinda as a overly skinny girl with braces. Stewart is WAY too old.
1 reply · active 741 weeks ago
After seeing Adventureland and Twilight, I'm skeptical of Kristen Stewart's acting...
Both yours and Ben's reviews make me want to read this. Although I did just finish a book where an 8-year-old gets raped, which was hard for me to read about. So I may put this one off for awhile.
1 reply · active 741 weeks ago
I really don't like books dealing with rape but this one isn't bad at all. I mean, yes it still happens but like Ben says, it isn't graphic, it doesn't go into detail of the attack.
There's no rape in the book Brenna. No graphic description of anything. That's how it stood out.
I've been wanting to read this book for a yr now. I've heard so many many people rave about it...____I do have a question. What age do you think is ok for girls to read this? I know the victim is 13, but do you think it's ok for a 13 yr old to read? Or 12? Or 11? ____There's nothing wrong with reading a YA every once in a while. I just don't get people who exclusively read YAs when there are so many amazing books out there for adults.
2 replies · active 741 weeks ago
I could see this book successfully being taught in middle school classes so I'd say somewhere around the 11-13 range. And obviously older.
Thanks. I have an 11 yr old, so I am considering getting the book for her. I wasn't sure if it was graphic, but see now that it's not. Thanks.
Ahhh rape! *shields eyes*

I can't tell if I could handle this. I guess I could if it's for younger kids and not graphic at all. I feel extra-squeamish when it comes to rape in books/media. And my reason is pretty much the lamest reason ever, but I'm going to explain it now, because yeah.

So in college, I was visiting my parents and I heard this panicked squeaking noise from outside my bedroom windows. I looked out and couldn't see anything, and then there, on the roof, was this male squirrel having his way with a lady squirrel, who sounded trapped and panicked and it was seriously terrible. This is probably me anthropomorphizing the squirrel, but I'm a human and I can't help it. So eeeever since then, I haven't been able to handle any kind of rape scene.

That being said, again, I'll probably check this out. I enjoy books that cause visceral reactions.
2 replies · active 707 weeks ago
I'm also really bad at dealing with rape scenes. It's one of the big reasons I didn't like Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. That and it was boring. Boring and rapey. Anyway, this book is not graphic so you should be able to handle it. And it is FAR from the complaints that it's practically softcore porn that a certain Missouri prof claimed
I laughed at "boring and rapey" and then felt bad about it.
Glad you liked it. I agree about the ending as I felt it stripped the tale from a good chunk of its power.
1 reply · active 475 weeks ago
Yeah it was too bad, but I guess at least the majority of the book was a winner.

Post a new comment

Comments by