Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Hidden Figures: Once you took the first step, anything was possible

By now, you've heard of Hidden Figures. Because I'm getting around to writing this way after the book came out and the movie came out.

If you've not heard of it then I commend you for the rock you've been under. It's terrifying up here and might there be space for one more?

Anyway, back to the book, which focuses on the black, female mathematicians and engineers that are responsible for so much, not just helping put people on the moon (but there is that, and it's pretty impressive) but the smaller projects are all manner of flight. As Shetterly says
What I wanted was [for these women] to have the grand, sweeping narrative that they deserved, the kind of American history that belongs to the Wright Brothers and the astronauts, to Alexander Hamilton and Martin Luther King Jr. Not told as a separate history, but as part of the story we all know. Not at the margins, but at the very center, the protagonists of the drama. And not just because they are black, or because they are women, but because they are part of the American epic.
And this she does, setting the stage for Langley from the '40s through the Apollo missions and highlighting the work the women did, and the struggles they faced.

The book focuses on more than just the three women in the movie, though they have the largest parts. There's less drama than the movie (no one violently smashes the sign above the bathroom that says "colored") and a lot more math, which I found to not be an issue because I just skimmed over it. I'm sure an engineer would be THRILLED to go over the specifics of whatever air displacement problem or I-can't-think-of-another-sciencey-sounding-example they had to tackle, but I chose to trust the math was correct and move on.

Because the book can be a little slow at times. There's not really a story arc here (it is non-fiction after all) but at times just seems like it is listing out the events that happened or what was going on. I had some trouble keeping the different women straight and I mentioned all the math above. But overall, these didn't really bother me. I didn't pick this up assuming it was going to have a straight narrative like the movie (which I saw after reading it) and I don't have an issue skimming when we seem to be getting in the weeds.

One thing that may have helped keep me engaged is the fact that my grandfather worked at Langley on-and-off throughout the time period this book covers, though not working in the same areas. At least not to the best of my knowledge and sadly he passed long before this movie came out, so I can't ask him about it, although I would have loved to be able to.

Not a perfect book and yeah, I liked the movie better from a story perspective, but still an interesting read about an important topic that shouldn't be overlooked.

Gif rating:
Title quote from page 246

Shetterly, Margot Lee. Hidden Figures: The Untold True Story of Four African-American Women Who Helped Launch Our Nation into Space. Harper Collins, 2016. Kindle

Comments (9)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Iiiinteresting! I have seen the movie (liked it a lot) and wanted to read the book but now maybe a bit less so? But I probably still shall. But less so.
1 reply · active 407 weeks ago
The book is still GOOD and provides more information on more people and some stuff on how things were for the guys. BUT it's still pretty dry especially compared to the movie. I mean, I saw people complaining the book didn't have any dialogue which...right, yes, that makes sense cos it's not historical fiction. Which I guess they were expecting? So, don't expect that.
I approached this as non-fiction, not even realising at the time (see: comment about rocks above) that there was going to be a movie, so I didn't find that it lagged, but if I had seen the film first (or even the trailer) I think I would have expected way more of a thread. Nonetheless, I'm glad that they made the movie that way, because I'm sure it attracted a much wider viewership than it would have if it had relied more on the math and less on the women! Would you still recommend it or are you truly torn?
3 replies · active 407 weeks ago
I saw the movie after reading the book, which I think helped me appreciate the book more. I'm sure had I seen the movie first I would have been expecting something that was more of a narrative.

Super happy they made it into a movie cos I thought the movie was very good AND that means the story goes out to a wider audience. I think the movie made the right changes to translate this to a movie (except maaaaaaybe making Kevin Costner the white savior of the segregated bathrooms. That was sorta dumb but whatever, movies need drama)

I think I'd still recommend with all of the caveats about what it is and what it isn't. I read this as part of a book club and a few of the people who saw the movie first were disappointed with the book.
*nods* It's such a statement that this scene was written in for a male white savior, but hopefully some other parts of the movie open up some other new territory for those viewers who have been so privileged that they don't recognise the racism simmering beneath that addition. There are so many other awesome performances in the film, that it's easier to set that aside! (After all, just griping about it is kinda giving that whole paradigm more air-time, now that I think about it!)
I feel like the white savior bit may actually help some people see other pieces of the movie that may otherwise have been missed. I don't even hate that bit of the movie (though obv not a favorite). It's a good example of how the movie did change things, since IRL the women basically just started using whatever bathroom they wanted and quietly the sign came down. But I get how that doesn't really drive home the point
I absolutely LOVED this movie and although the book still sounds interesting, it sounds like I wouldn't like it nearly as much. I think I'll stick to the movie! :-)
-Amy
2 replies · active 406 weeks ago
Yeah, I mean, not the worst idea to stick with the movie. Between the 2 it was def the more entertaining one.
Okay, good to know, thanks! :-)

Post a new comment

Comments by